Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0264

    Case T-264/18: Action brought on 27 April 2018 — Gruppo Armonie v EUIPO (mo.da)

    OJ C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201806080281931322018/C 221/422642018TC22120180625EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180427363611

    Case T-264/18: Action brought on 27 April 2018 — Gruppo Armonie v EUIPO (mo.da)

    Top

    C2212018EN3610120180427EN0042361361

    Action brought on 27 April 2018 — Gruppo Armonie v EUIPO (mo.da)

    (Case T-264/18)

    2018/C 221/42Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Gruppo Armonie SpA (Casalgrande, Italy) (represented by: G. Medri, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element mo.da — Application for registration No 16 430 035

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 February 2018 in Case R 2065/2017-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.
    Top