Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TA0187

Case T-187/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — VP v Cedefop (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period — Decision not to renew — Manifest error of assessment — Right to be heard — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Liability — Material damage — Non-material damage)

OJ C 53, 15.2.2021, p. 30–30 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.2.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/30


Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-187/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period - Decision not to renew - Manifest error of assessment - Right to be heard - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Liability - Material damage - Non-material damage)

(2021/C 53/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: M. Brugia, acting as Agent, and by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for (i) annulment of Cedefop’s decision of 12 May 2017 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite period and, as far as necessary, of the decision of 1 December 2017 rejecting her complaint of 9 August 2017 against the decision of 12 May 2017 and (ii) compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 12 May 2017 not to renew VP’s contract as a member of the temporary staff;

2.

Annuls the decision of 1 December 2017 rejecting VP’s complaint;

3.

Orders Cedefop to pay EUR 30 000 as compensation for the material damage sustained by VP;

4.

Orders Cedefop to pay EUR 10 000 as compensation for the non-material damage sustained by VP;

5.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

6.

Orders Cedefop to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.


Top