Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0301

Case C-301/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank

OJ C 285, 13.8.2018, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

201807270192025272018/C 285/343012018CJC28520180813EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180504202011

Case C-301/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank

Top

C2852018EN2010120180504EN0034201201

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank

(Case C-301/18)

2018/C 285/34Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Bonn

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Thomas Leonhard

Defendant: DSL Bank

Question referred

Is Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/65/EC ( 1 ) to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that, after withdrawal from a distance consumer loan contract has been declared, the supplier must also pay to the consumer, beyond the sum he has received from the consumer in accordance with the distance contract, compensation for the benefit of use in respect of this sum?


( 1 ) Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (OJ 2002 L 271, p. 16).

Top