This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CN0301
Case C-301/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank
Case C-301/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank
Case C-301/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank
OJ C 285, 13.8.2018, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case C-301/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2018 — Thomas Leonhard v DSL Bank
(Case C-301/18)
2018/C 285/34Language of the case: GermanReferring court
Landgericht Bonn
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Thomas Leonhard
Defendant: DSL Bank
Question referred
Is Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/65/EC ( 1 ) to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that, after withdrawal from a distance consumer loan contract has been declared, the supplier must also pay to the consumer, beyond the sum he has received from the consumer in accordance with the distance contract, compensation for the benefit of use in respect of this sum?
( 1 ) Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (OJ 2002 L 271, p. 16).