This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0083
Case T-83/16: Action brought on 18 February 2016 — Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Banca Widiba v EUIPO — ING-DIBa (WIDIBA)
Case T-83/16: Action brought on 18 February 2016 — Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Banca Widiba v EUIPO — ING-DIBa (WIDIBA)
Case T-83/16: Action brought on 18 February 2016 — Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Banca Widiba v EUIPO — ING-DIBa (WIDIBA)
OJ C 211, 13.6.2016, p. 52–53
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.6.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 211/52 |
Action brought on 18 February 2016 — Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Banca Widiba v EUIPO — ING-DIBa (WIDIBA)
(Case T-83/16)
(2016/C 211/66)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicants: Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (Siena, Italy), Wise Dialog Bank SpA (Banca Widiba SpA) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan and D. Contini, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ING-DIBa AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Applicants
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘WIDIBA’ — Application for registration No 12 192 308
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2015 in Joined Cases R 112/2015-2 and R 190/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision as it did not grant the request for restitutio in integrum, and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal; |
In the event of dismissal of conclusion 1) above,
|
— |
annul the contested decision as it upheld the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting the trade mark application No 12 192 308 for some specific goods and services, and declare that the EU trade mark application No 12 192 308 is eligible for registration for such goods and services or in alternative refer the case back to EUIPO in order for the latter to adopt the consequent measures; |
In any case,
|
— |
annul the contested decision insofar as it upheld ING-DIBa’s appeal on credit cards, and declare that the EU trade mark application No 12 192 308 is eligible for registration for such goods or in alternative refer the case back to EUIPO in order for the latter to adopt the consequent measures; |
In any case,
|
— |
order EUIPO to bear, in addition to its own costs, also the costs and legal fees borne by Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA and Wise Dialog Bank SpA with regard to the present proceedings and the proceedings before the EUIPO. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Articles 81(1) and 60 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |