Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0022

Case T-22/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções and Others v ECB

OJ C 106, 21.3.2016, p. 37–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.3.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/37

Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções and Others v ECB

(Case T-22/16)

(2016/C 106/43)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicants: Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal), Julião Maria Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon), Paulo Eduardo Matos Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon) and Isabel Maria Matos Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon) (represented by: M.A. Ribeiro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

—

Declare, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU, that the European Central Bank, by failing to pursue the complaint presented by the applicants on 27 November 2015, unjustifiably abstained from giving a decision, despite having been requested to do.

—

In the alternative, annul, pursuant to Articles 263 and 264 TFEU, the decision of the European Central Bank.

—

Order the European Central Bank, pursuant to Articles 340 TFEU and 41(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, to compensate the applicants in the amount of EUR 4 199 780,43, together with interest on late payments at the statutory rate until actual payment.

—

Order the European Central Bank to pay the costs, in accordance with Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.

1.

Unfounded refusal, by omission and failure to take a decision, of the request made to the European Central Bank to take action on the basis of a complaint submitted by the applicants on 27 November 2015, related to certain unlawful and unfounded acts carried out by the Banco de Portugal.

2.

Lack of impartiality, transparency, integrity, competence, efficiency and responsibility, breach of the principle of equality before the law (infringement of Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights).

3.

Infringement of essential procedural requirements, infringement of the Treaties and of rules of law relating to their application, misuse of powers.

4.

Favourable treatment and protection of IC Millenium/Bcp regarding the use of the financial system for money laundering and non-compliance with European Union obligations concerning the free movement of capital.

5.

Infringement of Article 11(3) of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’).
Top