This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0166
Case T-166/15: Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)
Case T-166/15: Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)
Case T-166/15: Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)
OJ C 198, 15.6.2015, p. 40–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.6.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 198/40 |
Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)
(Case T-166/15)
(2015/C 198/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Claus Gramberg (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. Kettler, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sorouch Mahdavi Sabet (Paris, France)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the design at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 1 968 496-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 460/2013-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision and declare Community design No 1 968 496-0002 invalid; in the alternative, |
|
— |
annul the contested decision and remit the case to the Board of Appeal for a new decision on the invalidity of Community design No 1 968 496-0002; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of 5(1)(b) Regulation No 6/2002; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002. |