This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0130
Case T-130/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
Case T-130/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
Case T-130/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
OJ C 155, 11.5.2015, p. 35–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.5.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 155/35 |
Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
(Case T-130/15)
(2015/C 155/42)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Cecchi, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WAVE TO PAY’ — Application for registration No 12 258 141
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2015 in Case R 1864/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, and also that there were contradictions in the contested decision; and consequently
|
Pleas in law
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-129/15.