Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015TN0011

    Case T-11/15: Action brought on 9 January 2015 — Internet Consulting v OHIM — Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (SUEDTIROL)

    OJ C 73, 2.3.2015, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.3.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 73/50

    Action brought on 9 January 2015 — Internet Consulting v OHIM — Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (SUEDTIROL)

    (Case T-11/15)

    (2015/C 073/61)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Internet Consulting GmbH (Brunico, Italy) (represented by: L. Miori and A. Bertella, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (Bolzano, Italy)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Internet Consulting GmbH

    Trade mark at issue: Word mark ‘SUEDTIROL’ — Community trade mark No 2 826 931

    Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

    Contested decision: Decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2014 in Case R 574/2013-G

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul or alter in full the contested decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2014, notified on 13 November 2014, refusing in any event the application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano in respect of the Community trade mark Suedtirol;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal before OHIM and the costs of the present proceedings.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement and/or misapplication of Articles 5 and 56 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement and misapplication of Articles 7(1)(c), 12 and 52 of that regulation.
    Top