Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TA0473

    Case T-473/15: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — Capella v EUIPO — Abus (APUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark APUS — Earlier national word mark ABUS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Successive restrictions of the trade mark application before the Board of Appeal — Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Competence of the Board of Appeal — Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rule 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

    OJ C 144, 8.5.2017, p. 37–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.5.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 144/37


    Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — Capella v EUIPO — Abus (APUS)

    (Case T-473/15) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark APUS - Earlier national word mark ABUS - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion - Successive restrictions of the trade mark application before the Board of Appeal - Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Competence of the Board of Appeal - Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Right to be heard - Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rule 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

    (2017/C 144/49)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Capella EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: F. Henkel, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Abus August Bremicker Söhne KG (Wetter, Germany) (represented by: G. Hallwachs, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2015 (Case R 117/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Abus August Bremicker Söhne and Capella.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2015 (Case R 117/2014-4);

    2.

    Orders EUIPO, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Capella EOOD;

    3.

    Declares that Abus August Bremicker Söhne KG is to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.


    Top