EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0013
Case T-13/15: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Media Logistik (PostModern) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark PostModern — Earlier national word mark POST and earlier EU word mark Deutsche Post — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
Case T-13/15: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Media Logistik (PostModern) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark PostModern — Earlier national word mark POST and earlier EU word mark Deutsche Post — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
Case T-13/15: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Media Logistik (PostModern) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark PostModern — Earlier national word mark POST and earlier EU word mark Deutsche Post — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
OJ C 256, 7.8.2017, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.8.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 256/19 |
Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Media Logistik (PostModern)
(Case T-13/15) (1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark PostModern - Earlier national word mark POST and earlier EU word mark Deutsche Post - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court))
(2017/C 256/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially K. Hamacher and C. Giersdorf, K. Hamacher, and finally K. Hamacher and G. Müllejans, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Media Logistik GmbH (Dresden, Germany) (represented by: S. Risthaus, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 November 2014 (Case R 2063/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Deutsche Post and Media Logistik.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Deutsche Post AG to pay the costs. |