This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0144
Case C-144/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Customs Support Holland BV
Case C-144/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Customs Support Holland BV
Case C-144/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Customs Support Holland BV
OJ C 198, 15.6.2015, p. 21–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
15.6.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 198/21 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Customs Support Holland BV
(Case C-144/15)
(2015/C 198/28)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Other party: Customs Support Holland BV
Questions referred
1) |
Must heading 2304 of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) be interpreted as meaning that that tariff heading also covers a soya protein concentrate obtained following the removal of residual fats, carbohydrates (or food fibres) and harmful substances from solid residues (so-called soya meal) resulting from the extraction of oil from soya beans, which, by means of that removal, has been made suitable for use as an ingredient in compound feeds for very young calves? |
2) |
If Question 1 is answered in the negative, is CN heading 2308 or CN heading 2309 then applicable to a soya protein concentrate obtained in the manner described in Question 1? |