This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0104
Case C-104/15: Action brought on 3 March 2015 — European Commission v Romania
Case C-104/15: Action brought on 3 March 2015 — European Commission v Romania
Case C-104/15: Action brought on 3 March 2015 — European Commission v Romania
OJ C 146, 4.5.2015, p. 29–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.5.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 146/29 |
Action brought on 3 March 2015 — European Commission v Romania
(Case C-104/15)
(2015/C 146/35)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae, D. Loma-Osorio Lerena, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Romania
Form of order sought
|
— |
Declare that, by not adopting the necessary measures to prevent pollution from dust particles coming from the Bosneag pond extension belonging to the copper and zinc mining operations of Moldomin at Moldova Noua, Romania has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 and Article 13(2) of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC (1); |
|
— |
Order Romania to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The action brought by the European Commission against Romania concerns the failure by the Romanian authorities to adopt the measures necessary to prevent pollution from dust particles coming from one of the ponds of a copper mining operation.
The Commission submits that, by not adopting the measures necessary to prevent the spread of dust particles from the surface of the Bosneag pond extension, which damage human health and the environment, Romania has not complied with Article 4 and Article 13(2) of Directive 2006/21/EC. The Commission considers that Romania must ensure the protection of human health and the environment from any negative effect whatsoever — even though it enjoys a certain degree of flexibility as to the specific measures that it must adopt — if the requirements defined in Article 4 of Directive 2006/21/EC are to be respected. The Commission also considers that Article 13(2) of the directive imposes a specific obligation on the competent authority, that is to say, that authority must ensure that the operator takes adequate measures to prevent or reduce the dust.
The Commission relies in these proceedings on the report of the competent Romanian authority for environmental protection, on information from the press and on the responses provided by Romania in the pre-litigation proceedings, all of which go to show that, in the area of Moldova Noua, there is significant pollution from dust coming from the Bosneag pond extension which, particularly at times when the wind is stronger, has a harmful effect on the health of the local inhabitants and the environment.
Furthermore, the Commission argues that Romania cannot rely on purely internal situations, such as the privatisation of Moldomin and the future environmental obligations of a buyer, in order to justify non-fulfilment of the obligations under the directive.