This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CB0510
Case C-510/15 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Burden of proof — Presumption of innocence — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction — Determining the gravity of the infringement and the additional amount in respect of deterrence — Justification — Principles of proportionality and equal treatment)
Case C-510/15 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Burden of proof — Presumption of innocence — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction — Determining the gravity of the infringement and the additional amount in respect of deterrence — Justification — Principles of proportionality and equal treatment)
Case C-510/15 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Burden of proof — Presumption of innocence — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction — Determining the gravity of the infringement and the additional amount in respect of deterrence — Justification — Principles of proportionality and equal treatment)
OJ C 343, 19.9.2016, p. 14–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.9.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 343/14 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission
(Case C-510/15 P) (1)
((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Burden of proof - Presumption of innocence - Fines - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction - Determining the gravity of the infringement and the additional amount in respect of deterrence - Justification - Principles of proportionality and equal treatment))
(2016/C 343/21)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Appellant: Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria, SA (represented by: T. Caiado Guerreiro and R. Rodrigues Lopes, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and J. Szczodrowski, Agents, and by M. Marques Mendes and A. Dias Henriques, avocats)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria SA shall pay the costs. |