Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0663

    Case T-663/14: Action brought on 10 September 2014 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM (BIG BINGO)

    OJ C 395, 10.11.2014, p. 57–58 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.11.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 395/57

    Action brought on 10 September 2014 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM (BIG BINGO)

    (Case T-663/14)

    (2014/C 395/70)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: M.D. Garayalde Niño, lawyer)

    Respondent: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    —

    annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2014 in Case R 755/2014-1;

    —

    approve for registration the Community trade mark application No 12 120 325‘BIG BINGO’ in Classes 9, 28 and 41;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark applied for: The figurative mark with the word elements ‘BIG BINGO’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 12 120 325

    Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the mark applied for

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

    Pleas in law:

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top