Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0333

    Case T-333/14: Action brought on 13 May 2014  — Helbrecht v OHIM — Lenci Calzature (SportEyes)

    OJ C 235, 21.7.2014, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.7.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 235/29


    Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Helbrecht v OHIM — Lenci Calzature (SportEyes)

    (Case T-333/14)

    2014/C 235/39

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Andreas Helbrecht (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: C. König, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lenci Calzature SpA (Turchetto-Montecarlo, Italy)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 February 2014 in Case R 830/2013-5;

    Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Lenci Calzature SpA, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SportEyes’ for goods in Class 25 — Community trade mark application No 7 5 04  525

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lenci Calzature SpA

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative marks including the word elements ‘EYE SPORT EYE’, ‘EYE fashion EYE’ and ‘EYE’ for goods in Class 25

    Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009


    Top