Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TB0845

    Case T-845/14: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2015 — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark HydroComfort — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

    OJ C 38, 1.2.2016, p. 57–58 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.2.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 38/57


    Order of the General Court of 30 November 2015 — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort)

    (Case T-845/14) (1)

    ((Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark HydroComfort - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

    (2016/C 038/76)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: August Brötje GmbH (Rastede, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: W. Schramek, D. Walicka and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 (Case R 1302/2014-5), concerning an application for registration of the word sign HydroComfort as a Community trade mark.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The action is dismissed.

    2.

    August Brötje GmbH shall pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.


    Top