Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TB0810

Case T-810/14: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2016 — Portugal v Commission (Failure to comply with a judgment of the Court establishing an infringement — Periodic penalty payment — Judgment quantifying the amount of the penalty payment — Repeal of the national legislation incompatible with EU law — Date when the infringement ceased — Annulment of an earlier decision quantifying a penalty payment imposed in compliance with the same judgment of the Court — Res judicata — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

OJ C 326, 5.9.2016, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

5.9.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/26


Order of the General Court of 27 June 2016 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-810/14) (1)

((Failure to comply with a judgment of the Court establishing an infringement - Periodic penalty payment - Judgment quantifying the amount of the penalty payment - Repeal of the national legislation incompatible with EU law - Date when the infringement ceased - Annulment of an earlier decision quantifying a penalty payment imposed in compliance with the same judgment of the Court - Res judicata - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 326/47)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, J. de Oliveira and S. Nunes de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz and M. Heller, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU asking for annulment of the Commission decision MARKT/A2/3523710 of 3 October 2014 quantifying the penalty payment due by the Portuguese Republic for the period between 20 and 29 January 2008, in compliance with the judgment of 10 January 2008 in Commission v Portugal (C-70/06, EU:C:2008:3).

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2.

The Portuguese Republic shall pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.


Top