This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TB0238
Case T-238/14: Order of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — EGBA and RGA v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Gambling and betting — Aid envisaged by France for horse-racing companies — Parafiscal levy collected on online horse-race betting — Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Association — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Case T-238/14: Order of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — EGBA and RGA v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Gambling and betting — Aid envisaged by France for horse-racing companies — Parafiscal levy collected on online horse-race betting — Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Association — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Case T-238/14: Order of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — EGBA and RGA v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Gambling and betting — Aid envisaged by France for horse-racing companies — Parafiscal levy collected on online horse-race betting — Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Association — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 222, 20.6.2016, p. 19–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
20.6.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 222/19 |
Order of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — EGBA and RGA v Commission
(Case T-238/14) (1)
((Action for annulment - State aid - Gambling and betting - Aid envisaged by France for horse-racing companies - Parafiscal levy collected on online horse-race betting - Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market - Association - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))
(2016/C 222/23)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) (Brussels, Belgium) and The Remote Gambling Association (RGA) (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S.-P. Brankin, Solicitor, T. De Meese, E. Wijckmans and M. Mudrony, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2014/19/EU of 19 June 2013 on State aid No SA.30753 (C 34/10) (ex N 140/10) which France is planning to implement for horse-racing companies (OJ 2014 L 14, p. 17).
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
2. |
European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) and The Remote Gambling Association (RGA) shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
3. |
The French Republic shall bear its own costs. |