This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CB0490
Case C-490/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — Cytochroma Development, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Appeal not brought against the operative part of the judgment under appeal — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Case C-490/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — Cytochroma Development, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Appeal not brought against the operative part of the judgment under appeal — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Case C-490/13 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — Cytochroma Development, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Appeal not brought against the operative part of the judgment under appeal — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 409, 17.11.2014, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 409/24 |
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — Cytochroma Development, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-490/13 P) (1)
((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Appeal not brought against the operative part of the judgment under appeal - Appeal manifestly unfounded))
2014/C 409/34
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Cytochroma Development, Inc. (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, A. Smith, Solicitor)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Cytochroma Development Inc. is ordered to pay the costs. |