This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0407
Case T-407/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)
Case T-407/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)
Case T-407/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)
OJ C 355, 17.11.2012, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
17.11.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 355/33 |
Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)
(Case T-407/12)
2012/C 355/69
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Ubee Interactive Corp. (Jhubei City, Taiwan) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Augere Holdings (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Form of order sought
— |
Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 July 2012 in case R 1849/2011-2; and |
— |
Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Ubee Interactive’, for goods and services in classes 9 and 38 — Community trade mark application No 7397326
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 7130248 of the word mark ‘QUBEE’, for goods and services in classes 9, 37, 38 and 42; Community trade mark No 7224603 of the figurative mark ‘QUBEE’, for goods and services in classes 9, 37, 38 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.