Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CN0436

Case C-436/12 P: Appeal brought on 28 September 2012 by Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation, against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2012 in Case T-264/00 Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation v Commission

OJ C 379, 8.12.2012, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.12.2012   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/16


Appeal brought on 28 September 2012 by Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation, against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2012 in Case T-264/00 Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation v Commission

(Case C-436/12 P)

2012/C 379/27

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation (represented by: A. Vianello, A. Bortoluzzi and A. Vegliantini, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

Set aside the order of 12 July 2012 in Case T-264/00 Compagnia Generale delle Acque SpA and Italian Republic v European Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by VEOLIA for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia under Laws No 30/1997 and 206/1995;

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Error of law in the application of the principles outlined by the Court of Justice in the judgment in Comitato Venezia vuole vivere [Joined Cases C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P and C-76/09 P], with regard to the allocation of the burden of proof as to the conditions set out in Article 87(1) EC; insufficient, incorrect and, in any event, contradictory reasoning.


Top