This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0137
Case T-137/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Guiai Bi Poin v Council
Case T-137/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Guiai Bi Poin v Council
Case T-137/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Guiai Bi Poin v Council
OJ C 130, 30.4.2011, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.4.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 130/22 |
Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Guiai Bi Poin v Council
(Case T-137/11)
2011/C 130/42
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Georges Guiai Bi Poin (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Georges GUIAI BI POIN, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact, |
— |
consequently,
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law alleging a breach of the obligation to state reasons, in so far as the grounds for including the applicant on the list of persons and entities to which the restrictive measures apply are stereotyped without any specific factual element making it possible to assess the relevance of that inclusion being mentioned. |
2. |
Second plea in law alleging a manifest error of assessment, in so far as:
|