This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0035
Case T-35/11: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission (Actions for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Case T-35/11: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission (Actions for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Case T-35/11: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission (Actions for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 409, 17.11.2014, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 409/38 |
Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission
(Case T-35/11) (1)
((Actions for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings - Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 409/55
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Kyocera Mita Europe BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. De Baere and P. Muñiz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Keppenne, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment in part of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2010 L 284, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
It is not necessary to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH and Olivetti SpA. |
|
3. |
Kyocera Mita Europe BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |