This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CA0309
Case C-309/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special regime for travel agencies — Differences between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’ )
Case C-309/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special regime for travel agencies — Differences between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’ )
Case C-309/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special regime for travel agencies — Differences between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’ )
OJ C 344, 23.11.2013, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
23.11.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 344/8 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland
(Case C-309/11) (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 306 to 310 - Special regime for travel agencies - Differences between language versions - National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers - Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’)
2013/C 344/11
Language of the case: Finnish
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Placios and I. Koskinen, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller and J. Očková, acting as Agents); Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna, acting as Agent); Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agent); French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J.-S. Pilczer, acting as Agents); Republic of Poland (represented by: A. Kraińska, A. Kramarczyk, M. Szpunar and B. Majczyna, acting as Agents);
Re:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation under which the special regime for taxation of travel agents applies to transactions carried out by travel agents for recipients other than travellers
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Republic of Finland; |
3. |
Orders the Czech Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs. |