EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0117
Case F-117/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Van Soest v Commission (Civil Service — Recruitment — Competition — Conditions for admission — Required qualification — Concept of a diploma attesting to a level of secondary education and giving access to post-secondary education — Decisions of the selection board for a competition — Nature of the review exercised by the appointing authority)
Case F-117/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Van Soest v Commission (Civil Service — Recruitment — Competition — Conditions for admission — Required qualification — Concept of a diploma attesting to a level of secondary education and giving access to post-secondary education — Decisions of the selection board for a competition — Nature of the review exercised by the appointing authority)
Case F-117/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Van Soest v Commission (Civil Service — Recruitment — Competition — Conditions for admission — Required qualification — Concept of a diploma attesting to a level of secondary education and giving access to post-secondary education — Decisions of the selection board for a competition — Nature of the review exercised by the appointing authority)
OJ C 340, 19.11.2011, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.11.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/37 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Van Soest v Commission
(Case F-117/10) (1)
(Civil Service - Recruitment - Competition - Conditions for admission - Required qualification - Concept of a diploma attesting to a level of secondary education and giving access to post-secondary education - Decisions of the selection board for a competition - Nature of the review exercised by the appointing authority)
2011/C 340/75
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Barry Van Soest (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision which terminated the recruitment procedure for the applicant, who had passed a competition and been included on the reserve list, because he did not hold a diploma of secondary education giving access to post-secondary education.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Van Soest. |