Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010CA0095

    Case C-95/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança (Public service contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 47(2) — Direct effect — Whether applicable to the services referred to in Annex II B to that directive)

    OJ C 139, 7.5.2011, p. 11–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.5.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 139/11


    Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança

    (Case C-95/10) (1)

    (Public service contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 47(2) - Direct effect - Whether applicable to the services referred to in Annex II B to that directive)

    2011/C 139/17

    Language of the case: Portuguese

    Referring court

    Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Strong Segurança SA

    Respondents: Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Interpretation of Articles 21, 23, 35(4) and 47(2) of, and of Annex II B to, Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Economic and financial capacity of the tenderers — Whether an economic operator can rely on the capacities of other entities — Direct effect of a directive implemented late

    Operative part of the judgment

    Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts does not create the obligation, for Member States, to apply Article 47(2) of that directive also to contracts which have as their object services referred to in Annex II B thereto. However, that directive does not preclude Member States and, possibly, contracting authorities from providing for such application in, respectively, their legislation and the documents relating to the contract.


    (1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.


    Top