This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TN0043
Case T-43/09: Action brought on 3 February 2009 — Cachuera v OHIM — Gelkaps (Ayanda)
Case T-43/09: Action brought on 3 February 2009 — Cachuera v OHIM — Gelkaps (Ayanda)
Case T-43/09: Action brought on 3 February 2009 — Cachuera v OHIM — Gelkaps (Ayanda)
OJ C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 53–53
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.3.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/53 |
Action brought on 3 February 2009 — Cachuera v OHIM — Gelkaps (Ayanda)
(Case T-43/09)
(2009/C 69/115)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: La Cachuera SA (Misiones, Argentina) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Gelkaps GmbH (Pritzwalk, Germany).
Form of order sought
|
— |
Declare the action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 19 November 2008 lodged in time and in the required form and, via the appropriate procedure, order the annulment of that decision and order expressly that OHIM pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Gelkaps GmbH.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘AYANDA’ (Application No 3.315.405) for goods and services in Classes 3, 5, 28, 29, 30, 32 and 44.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish figurative and word marks ‘AMANDA’, for goods in Class 30.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.