Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62008TN0475

Case T-475/08 P: Appeal brought on 29 October 2008 by Radu Duta against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 4 September 2008 in Case F-103/07 Duta v Court of Justice

OJ C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 40–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.3.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/40

Appeal brought on 29 October 2008 by Radu Duta against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 4 September 2008 in Case F-103/07 Duta v Court of Justice

(Case T-475/08 P)

(2009/C 69/93)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Radu Duta (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by F. Krieg, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Form of order sought by the appellant

—

Admit the present appeal;

—

declare it well founded;

—

accordingly, by amendment of the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 4 September 2008, declare the appellant's appeal admissible and well founded;

—

accordingly, on the basis of the claims set out above, annul the contested decisions;

—

so far as necessary, return the matter to the competent authority for a ruling in accordance with the judgment in the appeal;

—

order the respondent to pay the sum of EUR 1 100 000 (one million one hundred thousand Euros) in respect of damages and interest;

—

so far as necessary, order an expert to give a report on the extent of the financial loss suffered by the appellant;

—

order the respondent to pay all the costs and expenses of the case;

—

authorise the appellant expressly to refer to his pleadings at first instance which are annexed to the present appeal and form an integral part thereof;

—

as to the remainder, authorise the appellant expressly to reserve all his rights of actions and remedies and in particular the right to bring an action before the European Court of Human Rights.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present appeal, the appellant seeks the annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) of 4 September 2008, delivered in Case F-103/07 Duta v Court of Justice, dismissing as inadmissible the action by which the appellant sought, on the one hand, annulment of the memorandum informing him that he would not be offered a post as a Legal Secretary and, on the other, damages in compensation for the loss allegedly suffered.

The appellant states that his appeal is lodged as a protective measure in order to maintain his rights before the European Court of Human Rights. He does not give precise details of the contested points in the judgment of which he seeks annulment, or the legal arguments made in specific support of that claim.

Top