This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0586
Case T-586/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2010 — Kerma v OHIM (BIOPIETRA) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark BIOPIETRA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-586/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2010 — Kerma v OHIM (BIOPIETRA) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark BIOPIETRA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-586/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2010 — Kerma v OHIM (BIOPIETRA) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark BIOPIETRA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
OJ C 161, 19.6.2010, p. 40–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.6.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 161/40 |
Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2010 — Kerma v OHIM (BIOPIETRA)
(Case T-586/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark BIOPIETRA - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2010/C 161/62)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Kerma SpA (Raffa di Puegnago sul Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Manzoni, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: O. Montalto, Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 October 2008 (Case R 889/2008-1) concerning an application for registration of the word mark BIOPIETRA as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Kerma SpA to pay the costs. |