This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TB0105
Case T-105/07: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-105/07: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-105/07: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.5.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 134/34 |
Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG)
(Case T-105/07) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2010/C 134/57
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: MarketTools, Inc. (San Francisco, United States) (represented by: W. von der Osten-Sacken, A. González Hähnlein, O. Günzel and A. Wenninger, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: initially S. Laitinen, subsequently G. Schneider and D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Optimus-Telecomunicações, SA (Maia, Portugal) (represented by: T. Colaço Dias and J. Conceição Pimenta, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2007 (Case R 253/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Optimus-Telecomunicações, SA and MarketTools, Inc.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to rule on the action. |
|
2. |
The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. |
|
3. |
The intervener shall bear its own costs. |