EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006TA0145
Case T-145/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 February 2009 — Omya v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Request for information — Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Need for the information requested — Proportionality — Reasonable time — Misuse of powers — Breach of the principle of legitimate expectation)
Case T-145/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 February 2009 — Omya v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Request for information — Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Need for the information requested — Proportionality — Reasonable time — Misuse of powers — Breach of the principle of legitimate expectation)
Case T-145/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 February 2009 — Omya v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Request for information — Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Need for the information requested — Proportionality — Reasonable time — Misuse of powers — Breach of the principle of legitimate expectation)
OJ C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 35–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.3.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/35 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 February 2009 — Omya v Commission
(Case T-145/06) (1)
(Competition - Concentrations - Request for information - Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Need for the information requested - Proportionality - Reasonable time - Misuse of powers - Breach of the principle of legitimate expectation)
(2009/C 69/81)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Omya AG (Oftringen, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Ahlborn, C. Berg, Solicitors, C. Pinto Correia, lawyer, and J. Flynn QC)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by V. Di Bucci, X. Lewis, R. Sauer, A. Whelan and F. Amato, and subsequently by V. Di Bucci, X Lewis, R. Sauer and A. Whelan, Agents)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 8 March 2006 adopted pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1), and requesting the correction of the information communicated in the context of the examination of (Case COMP/M. 3796 Omya v J.M. Huber PCC)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Omya AG to pay the costs. |