This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52015DP0295
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))
OJ C 316, 22.9.2017, p. 272–272
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.9.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 316/272 |
P8_TA(2015)0295
Questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure)
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))
(2017/C 316/31)
The European Parliament,
|
— |
having regard to the letter of 4 September 2015 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
|
— |
having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure, |
|
1. |
Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure: ‘The expression “by way of exception” is to be interpreted as meaning that the additional question concerns a matter of urgency and that the submission of that question cannot wait until the following month. Furthermore, the number of questions tabled under the second subparagraph of paragraph 3 must be smaller than the norm of five questions per month.’ |
|
2. |
Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |