This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32025R2188
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2188 of 19 September 2025 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a science-based method for monitoring pollinator diversity and pollinator populations
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2188 of 19 September 2025 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a science-based method for monitoring pollinator diversity and pollinator populations
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2188 of 19 September 2025 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a science-based method for monitoring pollinator diversity and pollinator populations
C/2025/6310
OJ L, 2025/2188, 26.11.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2188/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
In force
|
Official Journal |
EN L series |
|
2025/2188 |
26.11.2025 |
COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2025/2188
of 19 September 2025
supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a science-based method for monitoring pollinator diversity and pollinator populations
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869 (1), and in particular Article 10(2),
Whereas:
|
(1) |
Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 requires Member States to improve pollinator diversity and reverse the decline of pollinator populations at the latest by 2030 and thereafter to achieve an increasing trend of pollinator populations, measured at least every six years from 2030, until satisfactory levels are achieved. |
|
(2) |
The Commission is to establish a science-based method for monitoring pollinator diversity and pollinator populations (the ‘monitoring method’) that provides a standardised approach for collecting annual data on the abundance and diversity of pollinator species across ecosystems, and for assessing pollinator population trends and the effectiveness of restoration measures. |
|
(3) |
Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 requires Member States to monitor annually the abundance and diversity of pollinator species using the monitoring method and to report the results of the monitoring to the Commission. |
|
(4) |
To ensure the collection of high-quality data and thereby a scientifically sound assessment of progress towards the target for restoration of pollinator populations, the monitoring method should be based on established scientific principles and methods. Despite being standardised across Member States, the monitoring method should allow sufficient flexibility to address local environmental conditions. |
|
(5) |
The scope of the monitoring method should target the taxonomic groups of pollinators for which there is sufficient technical capacity for monitoring or where such capacity can be built cost-effectively in the short term. The scope should be reviewed and broadened to additional taxonomic groups of pollinators when the technical capacity increases in the future. |
|
(6) |
To ensure the cost-effectiveness of the monitoring method, a variety of approaches should be used for monitoring of common pollinator species and rare pollinator species. Common species should be monitored on sites selected by applying a stratified random sampling approach. Rare pollinator species should be monitored by targeted field visits as population trends for these species cannot be discerned by stratified random sampling at a limited number of monitoring sites. |
|
(7) |
Considering the limited capacity for monitoring of rare pollinator species by targeted field visits, efforts should be focused on the most threatened species at Union or national level, and Member States should be allowed to limit the monitoring to 15 rare pollinator species. The number of rare pollinator species to be monitored should be reviewed and enlarged when capacity for targeted monitoring increases in the future. |
|
(8) |
Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 requires Member States to ensure that the monitoring data comes from an adequate number of monitoring sites to ensure representativeness across their territories. For this, and to ensure that the trend in pollinator abundance and diversity can be confidently determined, it is necessary to set a minimum for the number of monitoring sites at which data is to be collected in each Member State. Setting this minimum number will allow Member States to monitor a larger number of monitoring sites so they can better detect changes in pollinator abundance and diversity. |
|
(9) |
The activity of pollinators is affected by various environmental conditions, which depend on local circumstances. Therefore, the monitoring should be limited to periods in which pollinators are active at the adult stage of their life cycle. Suitable environmental conditions for monitoring should be defined at national, regional, or local level, as appropriate. |
|
(10) |
The diversity of common pollinator species should be described using the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index (2), a widely accepted metric for quantifying biological diversity. The abundance of common pollinator species should be quantified by combining the abundances of individual pollinator species for which monitoring data are sufficient. |
|
(11) |
It is appropriate to combine abundance and diversity of all common species monitored into a single common pollinator indicator, which provides one value per Member State per year. |
|
(12) |
Alien species, as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), should not be taken into account when assessing the abundance and diversity of pollinator species, since the presence of such species cannot be considered as a contribution to native pollinator communities but rather constitutes a threat to biodiversity. |
|
(13) |
Since the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index is not a suitable metric for the diversity of rare species, in order to represent the overall diversity of pollinator species, both common and rare, it is appropriate to integrate rare pollinator species into the assessment of pollinator diversity through a pollinator species richness indicator, i.e. an indicator that combines the number of rare and common pollinator species recorded in a Member State. The monitoring of rare species should exclude moths, because the monitoring burden cannot be estimated due to the current lack of red list assessments for moths. |
|
(14) |
To assess the effectiveness of restoration measures implemented in a Member State, trends in the abundance and diversity of pollinator species should be estimated in agricultural ecosystems, forest ecosystems, and other ecosystems, respectively, given that the restoration measures are substantially different in each of those ecosystem types, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Definitions
For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
|
(1) |
‘bees’ means species of Anthophila (Apoidea), excluding the honeybee (Apis mellifera); |
|
(2) |
‘hoverflies’ means species of Syrphidae; |
|
(3) |
‘butterflies’ means species of Papilionoidea; |
|
(4) |
‘moths’ means species of the following families of Heterocera: Brachodidae, Castniidae, Cimeliidae, Drepanidae, Erebidae (including Lymantriinae), Euteliidae, Geometridae, Heterogynidae, Limacodidae, Noctuidae, Nolidae, Notodontidae, Sesiidae, Sphingidae, Uraniidae, and Zygaenidae, provided they have a wingspan of 20 mm or more assessed on the basis of literature; |
|
(5) |
‘day-active moths’ means species of moths that are active in the daytime at the adult stage of their lifecycle; |
|
(6) |
‘night-active moths’ means species of moths that are active at night at the adult stage of their lifecycle; |
|
(7) |
‘LUCAS master grid’ means a variation of the INSPIRE Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area 1 km Grid (Grid_ETRS89-LAEA_1km), based on the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area Coordinate Reference System (ETRS89-LAEA), with a fixed projection centre at 52° N, 10° E (4); |
|
(8) |
‘stratified random sampling of monitoring sites’ means a standardised statistical sampling, where monitoring sites have an equal probability of being selected from a population that is partitioned in sub-populations (strata); |
|
(9) |
‘biogeographical regions’ means biogeographical regions listed in Article 1, point (c)(iii), of Council Directive 92/43/EEC (5); |
|
(10) |
‘other ecosystems’ means ecosystems other than agricultural ecosystems and forest ecosystems that are aggregated in one stratum; |
|
(11) |
‘transect walk’ means a data collection method in which a surveyor walks a predetermined route (transect) in order to gather field data on pollinator species; |
|
(12) |
‘observation period’ means the period of the year which corresponds to the flying season of the large majority of the pollinator species; |
|
(13) |
‘light trap’ means a device which attracts pollinator species during the night-time by using light and captures them in a container; |
|
(14) |
‘assessment period’ means the time period over which progress to the target referred to in Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 is assessed; |
|
(15) |
‘alien species’ means alien species as defined in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014. |
Article 2
Target species
Member States shall collect data on the abundance and diversity of pollinator species in the following taxonomic groups:
|
(a) |
bees; |
|
(b) |
hoverflies; |
|
(c) |
butterflies; |
|
(d) |
moths. |
Article 3
Monitoring sites
1. A site for data collection (‘monitoring site’) shall be a 2 km-by-2 km square centred on a point of the LUCAS master grid.
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may use pre-established monitoring sites, insofar as those sites were selected in accordance with the requirements set out in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6.
3. Member States shall collect data on the abundance and diversity of pollinator species on the minimum number of monitoring sites set out in Annex I.
4. Member States shall select the monitoring sites by applying stratified random sampling. The stratification shall be by biogeographical region and by the following ecosystem types:
|
(a) |
agricultural ecosystems; |
|
(b) |
forest ecosystems; |
|
(c) |
other ecosystems. |
In addition to the stratification referred to in the first subparagraph, Member States may apply stratification by NUTS regions, classes of altitude, protection status or more refined categories of land use or land cover.
The number of sites in each stratum shall be proportional to the geographical share of that stratum in the terrestrial territory of a given Member State.
5. The procedure for stratified random sampling of sites shall ensure representativeness across the national territory.
The distances between the monitoring sites shall be at least:
|
(a) |
10 km for Member States with a terrestrial territory above 75 000 km2; |
|
(b) |
5 km for Member States with a terrestrial territory between 20 000 km2 and 75 000 km2; |
|
(c) |
1 km for Member States with a terrestrial territory between 1 000 km2 and 20 000 km2. |
There shall be no minimum distance between the monitoring sites for Member States with a terrestrial territory below 1 000 km2.
6. When applying the stratified random sampling of monitoring sites, Member States may exclude a monitoring site if it meets at least one of the following exclusion criteria:
|
(a) |
more than 30 % of the monitoring site is without terrestrial vegetation; |
|
(b) |
the monitoring site is partially or fully located in urban centres, urban clusters or peri-urban areas; |
|
(c) |
at least 30 % of the monitoring site is inaccessible due to the presence of public infrastructure or because the monitoring site is located in a public area with restricted access, such as a military zone, border zone or hunting zone; |
|
(d) |
at least 30 % of the monitoring site is inaccessible because the monitoring site is located in a private area which is a border zone or hunting zone; |
|
(e) |
the monitoring site is situated at a latitude above 65° N; |
|
(f) |
data collection at the monitoring site is hindered for at least one of the following reasons:
|
|
(g) |
the monitoring site cannot be attributed to one of the strata referred to in paragraph 4 |
7. Member States shall draw up a list of the monitoring sites selected in accordance with paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 within their territory (‘list of monitoring sites’).
The list of monitoring sites shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period.
8. By way of derogation from paragraph 7, second subparagraph, a site on the list of monitoring sites may be replaced at any time if it can be concluded that it fulfils at least one of the exclusion criteria set out in paragraph 6. Monitoring sites that are excluded from the list shall be replaced by applying stratified random sampling as referred to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6.
9. Member States shall inform the Commission and the European Environment Agency of the list of monitoring sites, and any change to it, without delay. The European Environment Agency shall make the list publicly available.
Article 4
Observation period
Member States shall define, for each site, the observation period during which the data collection in accordance with Articles 5 and 6 shall take place every year. The observation period shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period.
Article 5
Data collection protocol for bees, hoverflies, butterflies and day-active moths
1. During the observation period set out in accordance with Article 4, Member States shall collect data on bees, hoverflies, butterflies and day-active moths on each monitoring site by undertaking transect walks.
2. Transect walks shall be undertaken separately for:
|
(a) |
bees; |
|
(b) |
hoverflies; |
|
(c) |
butterflies and day-active moths. |
3. The transect walks shall be carried out at the same monitoring site once a month during the observation period, with a minimum time interval of three weeks.
4. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, where the environmental conditions referred to in paragraph 7 are not met over an extended period of time which prevents the execution of the transect walks once per month, the transect walks may be carried out less frequently than once per month.
5. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, Member States may carry out transect walks at higher frequency at monitoring sites where the observation period is shorter than six months. In this case, the minimum time interval shall be less than three weeks.
6. For each transect walk, the following environmental parameters shall be recorded:
|
(a) |
temperature (in °C); |
|
(b) |
cloud cover (in oktas); |
|
(c) |
wind speed (in m/s); |
|
(d) |
fog (presence/absence); |
|
(e) |
precipitation (presence/absence); |
|
(f) |
start time (hh:mm); |
|
(g) |
any other relevant parameters that may affect the data collection. |
7. Transect walks shall be undertaken under environmental conditions during which the species referred to in paragraph 1 are active at the adult stage of their lifecycle. For this purpose, for the environmental parameters listed in paragraph 6, points (a) to (f), Member States shall specify the conditions under which the transect walks are to be undertaken. Those conditions may be adapted to local circumstances and shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period.
8. The length of each transect walk shall be 1 km.
9. The same transect trajectory shall be used for bees, hoverflies, butterflies and day-active moths at each monitoring site. The transect trajectory shall be fully positioned within the boundaries of the monitoring site. The transect trajectory may be continuous or split in parts. It shall be geo-referenced and mapped before the data collection starts. Each part of the transect trajectory shall be attributed to one of the ecosystem types referred to in Article 3(4), first subparagraph. The transect trajectory on each monitoring site shall not be changed unless it becomes partly or fully inaccessible due to force majeure.
10. The transect shall be walked in a forward direction at constant speed for a total effective observation time of 60 minutes. The observation time shall not include the time needed for catching, handling, identifying or recording of specimens.
11. Data shall be collected within the following delineated three-dimensional observation space around the person carrying out the transect walk (‘the surveyor’):
|
(a) |
for bees and hoverflies: 1,5 m to each side of the surveyor, 1,5 m ahead of the surveyor, and 1,5 m above the surveyor; |
|
(b) |
for butterflies and day-active moths: 2,5 m to each side of the surveyor, 5 m ahead of the surveyor, and 5 m above the surveyor. |
12. Each recording of a specimen shall be attributed to one of the ecosystem types referred to in Article 3(4), first subparagraph.
Article 6
Data collection protocol for night-active moths
1. During the observation period set out in accordance with Article 4, Member States shall collect data on night-active moths at each monitoring site by using light traps.
2. The light traps shall be active for one night a month during the observation period, with a minimum time interval between active periods of a light trap at the same monitoring site of three weeks.
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, where the environmental conditions referred to in paragraph 6 are not met over an extended period of time which prevents the monthly placing of light traps, the light traps may be placed less frequently than once a month.
4. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, the light traps may be placed more frequently than once a month at monitoring sites where the observation period is shorter than six months. In this case, the minimum time interval shall be less than three weeks.
5. During the active period of each light trap, the following environmental parameters shall be recorded:
|
(a) |
temperature (in °C); |
|
(b) |
cloud cover (in oktas); |
|
(c) |
wind speed (in m/s); |
|
(d) |
fog (presence/absence); |
|
(e) |
precipitation (presence/absence); |
|
(f) |
principal moon phase (new moon, first quarter, full moon, last quarter); |
|
(g) |
any other relevant parameters that may affect the data collection. |
6. Light traps shall be placed under environmental conditions during which the species referred to in paragraph 1 are active at the adult stage of their lifecycle. For this purpose, for the environmental parameters listed in paragraph 5, points (a) to (f), Member States shall specify the conditions under which the light traps are to be placed. Those conditions may be adapted to the circumstances at each site and shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period.
7. Two light traps shall be placed at each monitoring site, with a distance of at least 50 m between them. The light traps shall be placed at least 10 m from water bodies, and at least 50 m from artificial light sources. They shall be placed in such a manner that the top of the light source is between 30 cm and 1 m above ground level. A 1 m radius around each trap shall be free of obstructions that could block the light of the trap.
8. The position of the light traps shall be georeferenced and mapped for each monitoring site before data collection starts. Each light trap shall be attributed to one of the ecosystem types referred to in Article 3(4), first subparagraph. The location of each light trap shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period, unless it becomes inaccessible due to force majeure.
9. Member States shall use an identical light trap design and an identical light source type at all monitoring sites. The light trap design and the light source type shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, a different light trap design and light source type may be used in latitudes higher than 60° N.
The light source of each light trap shall have a high output in the ultra-violet and blue light range (350-550 nm). The light sources shall be duly maintained with no substantial changes in light intensity or spectral composition over time.
Article 7
Data collection protocol for rare pollinator species
1. Member States shall carry out targeted monitoring of all bee, hoverfly and butterfly species that are assessed as critically endangered. For this purpose, Member State may use the EU Red List of Threatened Species (6), or a national red list of species, or both.
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, if the number of species established in accordance with paragraph 1 is higher than 15, Member States may limit the number of species to be monitored to 15.
3. Member States shall draw up a list of species to be monitored in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 and notify it to the Commission. That list shall not be changed in the course of an assessment period.
4. Species on the list referred to in paragraph 3 shall be monitored by targeted field visits at least once per year at known locations of the species, establishing their presence or absence. Member States may discontinue the monitoring of a species in a given year once its presence has been established at least at one location.
5. All recordings of species referred to in paragraph 3 shall be geo-referenced.
Article 8
Species identification
Member States shall identify observed or caught specimens of target species to the species level by using expert-based diagnostics, DNA-based methods, artificial intelligence, or other scientifically proven methods.
Article 9
Assessment of pollinator population trends
1. The trends in pollinator abundance and diversity shall be assessed based on the data collected by Member States in accordance with this Regulation.
2. To carry out the assessment referred to in paragraph 1, a common pollinator indicator shall be calculated for each Member State using the method set out in Annex II, and a pollinator species richness indicator shall be calculated for each Member State using the method set out in Annex III.
3. Alien species shall be excluded from the scope of the assessment.
4. The first assessment period shall start 16 December 2026 and shall end in 2030. Thereafter, each subsequent assessment period shall last six years.
Article 10
Assessment of the effectiveness of restoration measures
For the purpose of assessing the effectiveness of the restoration measures in accordance with Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1991, the common pollinator indicator shall be calculated separately for each of the ecosystem types referred to in Article 3(4), first subparagraph.
Article 11
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 September 2025.
For the Commission
The President
Ursula VON DER LEYEN
(1) OJ L, 2024/1991, 29.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1991/oj.
(2) Allaby, M. (2020) A Dictionary of Zoology (5 ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford (doi: 10.1093/acref/9780198845089.001.0001).
(3) Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species (OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 35, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/1143/oj).
(4) https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lucas/database/primary-data.
(5) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/43/oj).
(6) https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/nature-and-biodiversity/european-red-list-threatened-species_en.
ANNEX I
MINIMUM NUMBER OF MONITORING SITES
|
Member State |
Minimum number of monitoring sites |
|
Belgium |
60 |
|
Bulgaria |
80 |
|
Czechia |
70 |
|
Denmark |
50 |
|
Germany |
90 |
|
Estonia |
50 |
|
Ireland |
40 |
|
Greece |
80 |
|
Spain |
100 |
|
France |
120 |
|
Croatia |
70 |
|
Italy |
100 |
|
Cyprus |
40 |
|
Latvia |
50 |
|
Lithuania |
50 |
|
Luxembourg |
40 |
|
Hungary |
70 |
|
Malta |
30 |
|
Netherlands |
50 |
|
Austria |
80 |
|
Poland |
70 |
|
Portugal |
70 |
|
Romania |
80 |
|
Slovenia |
70 |
|
Slovakia |
70 |
|
Finland |
70 |
|
Sweden |
70 |
ANNEX II
COMMON POLLINATOR INDICATOR
1. General rules
|
(1) |
The common pollinator indicator to be calculated for each Member State shall be based on the data collected pursuant to Articles 5 and 6. It shall only take into consideration recordings of specimens identified to the species level pursuant to Article 8. It shall not take into consideration alien species. |
|
(2) |
The common pollinator indicator shall combine the measurements of the trends in abundance and diversity of common target species. Those trends shall be calculated for each assessment period and for each taxonomic group referred to in Article 2 based on the annual species abundance indices and the annual species diversity indices established in accordance with Sections 2 and 3. |
2. Annual species abundance indices
|
(1) |
A species-specific abundance index shall be calculated annually for each species observed in a Member State based on the methodology for a generalised abundance index described by Dennis et al. (2016) (1). |
|
(2) |
The species-specific abundance index referred to in paragraph (1) shall take into account only species that have been observed in a Member State at least 25 times per year on average over the assessment period. |
|
(3) |
The methodology for a generalised abundance index may be enhanced by taking into account the conditions recorded pursuant to Article 5(6), points (a) to (f) for the species referred to in Article 5(1), and pursuant to Article 6(5), points (a) to (f) for night-active moths. |
|
(4) |
A multi-species abundance index shall be calculated annually for each taxonomic group using the annual species-specific indices referred to in paragraph (1), based on the methodology described by Freeman et al. (2021) (2). |
3. Annual species diversity indices
|
(1) |
A site-specific species diversity index shall be calculated annually for each monitoring site and each taxonomic group using the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index (3) methodology. |
|
(2) |
A species diversity index shall be calculated annually for each taxonomic group using all annual site-specific species diversity indices referred to in paragraph (1), using the methodology described by Freeman et al. (2021). |
4. Trends in species abundance and in species diversity
|
(1) |
The methodology described by Freeman et al. (2021) shall provide the trends in the species abundance based on the multi-species abundance indices referred to in Section 2, paragraph (4), and shall provide the trends in the species diversity based on the species diversity indices referred to in Section 3, paragraph (2) over each assessment period. |
|
(2) |
For the first assessment period, the method referred to in paragraph (1) shall be constrained to fit a straight line across the annual values of the multi-species abundance indices and the species diversity indices. |
|
(3) |
For the assessment periods after 2030, smoothed trends shall be calculated, with the smoothness of the trends being determined using the approach described by Massimino et al. (2025) (4). |
5. Calculation of the common pollinator indicator
|
(1) |
For each assessment period, the probability of a positive trend shall be determined separately for the trends in species abundance and the trends in species diversity for each taxonomic group. Those probabilities shall be converted into an odds ratio. |
|
(2) |
The product of all odds ratios referred to in paragraph (1) shall be calculated. |
|
(3) |
The product of all odds ratios referred to in paragraph (2) shall be converted back to a combined probability that both species abundance and species diversity are increasing across all taxonomic groups. That combined probability shall constitute the common pollinator indicator, which shall be provided with a 90 % confidence interval. |
(1) Dennis, E.B., Morgan, B.J.T., Freeman, S.N., Brereton, T.M. and Roy, D.B. (2016), A Generalized Abundance Index for Seasonal Invertebrates. Biometrics 72: 1305-1314 (https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12506).
(2) Freeman, S.N., Isaac, N.J.B., Besbeas, P., Dennis, E.B. and Morgan, B.J.T. (2021), A Generic Method for Estimating and Smoothing Multispecies Biodiversity Indicators Using Intermittent Data. JABES 26: 71–89 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00410-6).
(3) Allaby, M. (2020) A Dictionary of Zoology (5 ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford (doi: 10.1093/acref/9780198845089.001.0001).
(4) Massimino, D., Baillie, S.R., Balmer, D.E., Bashford, R.I., Gregory, R.D., Harris, S.J., Heywood, J.J.N., Kelly, L.A., Noble, D.G., Pearce-Higgins, J.W., Raven, M.J., Risely, K., Woodcock, P., Wotton, S.R. and Gillings, S. (2025), The Breeding Bird Survey of the United Kingdom. Global Ecology and Biogeography 34: e13943 (https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13943).
ANNEX III
POLLINATOR SPECIES RICHNESS INDICATOR
1.
A pollinator species richness index shall be calculated annually for each Member State based on the data collected pursuant to Articles 5, 6 and 7. It shall only take into consideration recordings of specimens identified to the species level pursuant to Article 8. It shall not take into consideration alien species.
2.
For each assessment period, the assessment shall be based on a linear regression analysis of the annual species richness indices referred to in paragraph 1.
3.
The pollinator species richness indicator shall be calculated as the slope of the regression line.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2188/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)