 
                This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CJ0347
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2024.
LB and JL v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Natural person who has acquired a residential property to be leased for consideration.
Case C-347/23.
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2024.
LB and JL v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Natural person who has acquired a residential property to be leased for consideration.
Case C-347/23.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:919
Case C‑347/23 [Zabitoń] ( i )
LB
and
JL
v
Getin Noble Bank S.A.
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie)
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2024
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Natural person who has acquired a residential property to be leased for consideration)
Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13 – Concept of consumer – Natural person who has entered into a loan agreement for the purchase of a residential property to be leased for consideration – Included – Conditions – Natural person acting for purposes which are outside his or her trade, business or profession – Individual seeking to earn income from the management of that property – Not relevant
(Council Directive 93/13, Art. 2(b))
(see paragraphs 29-31, 33-36 and operative part)
( i ) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.