This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024CO0511
Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 September 2024.
Aylo Freesites LTD v European Commission.
Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate as a very large online platform – Action for annulment – Balancing of competing interests.
Case C-511/24 P(R).
Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 September 2024.
Aylo Freesites LTD v European Commission.
Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate as a very large online platform – Action for annulment – Balancing of competing interests.
Case C-511/24 P(R).
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:719
Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 September 2024 –
Aylo Freesites v Commission
(Case C-511/24 P(R))
(Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate as a very large online platform – Action for annulment – Balancing of competing interests)
|
1. |
Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature – Balancing of all the interests involved – Discretion of the judge hearing the application for interim relief (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 156(4)) (see paragraphs 17-22, 28, 29) |
|
2. |
Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage – Balancing of all the interests involved – Whether interests of third parties taken into account – Included – Whether damage caused to third parties taken into account – Not included (Art. 278 TFEU) (see paragraphs 27, 31-33) |
|
3. |
Appeal – Grounds – Inadequate or contradictory grounds – Scope of the obligation to state reasons – Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning – Whether permissible – Conditions (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 119) (see paragraphs 43, 44, 47-51) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Aylo Freesites LTD shall pay the costs. |