Ez a dokumentum az EUR-Lex webhelyről származik.
Dokumentum 62013CO0602
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2015 —
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
(Case C‑602/13) 1 ( 1 )
‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Contractual relationship between a seller or a supplier and a consumer — Mortgage contract — Default interest clause — Early repayment clause — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — Moderation of the amount of interest — Powers of the national court)’
|
1. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Finding that a clause is unfair — Scope — Revision by the national court of the content of an unfair term — Not permissible — Substitution by the national court of an unfair term with a supplementary provision of national law — Lawfulness — Conditions (Council Directive 93/13, Recital 24 and Arts 6(1) and 7(1)) (see paras 33-38, 49) |
|
2. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Finding that a clause is unfair — Scope — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — National rules moderating default interest rates under mortgage contracts — Lawfulness — Conditions (Council Directive 93/13, Arts 3(1), 4(1), 6(1) and 7(1)) (see paras 40-42, 45, 46, operative part) |
|
3. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Unfair term within the meaning of Article 3 — Assessment of unfair nature by the national court — Criteria (Council Directive 93/13, Arts 3(1) and 4(1)) (see paras 43, 44, 51) |
|
4. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Finding that a clause is unfair — Scope — Obligation for the national court, of its own motion, to draw all the consequences which result from that finding — Contractual term not executed — No effect (Council Directive 93/13, Arts 3(1) and 7(1)) (see paras 52-54, operative part 2) |
Operative part
|
1. |
Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions for moderating default interest under a mortgage contract, provided that those national provisions:
|
|
2. |
Directive 93/13 must be interpreted as meaning that, where the national court has established the ‘unfairness’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13 of a clause in a contract between a consumer and a seller or a supplier, the fact that that clause has not been executed cannot, in itself, prevent the national court drawing the appropriate conclusions from the ‘unfair’ nature of that clause. |
( 1 ) OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2015 —
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
(Case C‑602/13) 1 ( 1 )
‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Contractual relationship between a seller or a supplier and a consumer — Mortgage contract — Default interest clause — Early repayment clause — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — Moderation of the amount of interest — Powers of the national court)’
|
1. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Finding that a clause is unfair — Scope — Revision by the national court of the content of an unfair term — Not permissible — Substitution by the national court of an unfair term with a supplementary provision of national law — Lawfulness — Conditions (Council Directive 93/13, Recital 24 and Arts 6(1) and 7(1)) (see paras 33-38, 49) |
|
2. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Finding that a clause is unfair — Scope — Mortgage enforcement proceedings — National rules moderating default interest rates under mortgage contracts — Lawfulness — Conditions (Council Directive 93/13, Arts 3(1), 4(1), 6(1) and 7(1)) (see paras 40-42, 45, 46, operative part) |
|
3. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Unfair term within the meaning of Article 3 — Assessment of unfair nature by the national court — Criteria (Council Directive 93/13, Arts 3(1) and 4(1)) (see paras 43, 44, 51) |
|
4. |
Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13 — Finding that a clause is unfair — Scope — Obligation for the national court, of its own motion, to draw all the consequences which result from that finding — Contractual term not executed — No effect (Council Directive 93/13, Arts 3(1) and 7(1)) (see paras 52-54, operative part 2) |
Operative part
|
1. |
Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions for moderating default interest under a mortgage contract, provided that those national provisions:
|
|
2. |
Directive 93/13 must be interpreted as meaning that, where the national court has established the ‘unfairness’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13 of a clause in a contract between a consumer and a seller or a supplier, the fact that that clause has not been executed cannot, in itself, prevent the national court drawing the appropriate conclusions from the ‘unfair’ nature of that clause. |
( 1 ) OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.