This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024CO0047
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2024.
CN v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-47/24.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2024.
CN v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-47/24.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:869
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2024 –
Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe
(Case C‑47/24) ( 1 )
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)
(see paragraphs 32, 39, 41-44, 47-56, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary), by decision of 10 January 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
( 1 ) OJ C 2592, 22.4.2024.