This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CJ0632
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.
AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection.
Case C-632/22.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.
AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection.
Case C-632/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:601
Case C‑632/22
Volvo AB
v
Transsaqui SL
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2024
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection)
Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Direct effect – Right of individuals to claim compensation for damage suffered – Action for compensation brought against a parent company – Document instituting proceedings served on the subsidiary domiciled in a Member State other than that of the parent company – Subsidiary not expressly authorised to receive judicial documents intended for the parent company – Invalid service of summons – Parent company forming an economic unit with the subsidiary within the meaning of competition law – Irrelevant
(Art. 101 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1393/2007)
(see paragraphs 48-53, 70, operative part)
Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Direct effect – Right of individuals to claim compensation for damage suffered – Action for compensation brought against a parent company – Document instituting proceedings served on the subsidiary domiciled in a Member State other than that of the parent company – Validity of the writ of summons – Conditions – Obligation to comply with the rules governing the transmission and service of documents laid down by Regulation No 1393/2007
(Art. 101 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1393/2007, Arts 1(1) and (2), 5(2), 8, 11(2), second para.)
(see paragraphs 54-69)