This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0341
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.
Nadya Rauff-Nisthar v European Commission.
Civil service – Officials – Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – New plea.
Case T-341/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.
Nadya Rauff-Nisthar v European Commission.
Civil service – Officials – Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – New plea.
Case T-341/21.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:516
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022 –
Rauff-Nisthar v Commission
(Case T‑341/21) ( 1 )
(Civil service – Officials – Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – New plea)
1. |
Actions brought by officials – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision adopted after reconsideration of a previous decision – Decision adopted by a competition selection board after reviewing the file of a candidate who has not been included on the reserve list (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90(2) and 91(1)) (see paragraphs 18, 19) |
2. |
Actions brought by officials – Act adversely affecting an official – Explicit decision rejecting the complaint – Decision adopted after reconsideration of a previous decision – Account taken of the reasoning therein (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91) (see paragraphs 21-23) |
3. |
Officials – Competitions – Obligation on EU institutions to assure all candidates a smooth and regular running of the tests – Infringement – Relevance to the legality of the tests – Conditions – Burden of proof (see paragraphs 29-33, 42-44, 48-50) |
4. |
Actions brought by officials – Pleas in law – Plea alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment – Reliance on the applicant’s individual circumstances in an action brought against a decision of a competition selection board – Rejection (see paragraph 47) |
5. |
Officials – Competitions – Assessment of the aptitudes of candidates – Selection Board’s discretion – Taking into consideration factors other than the performance of the candidates – Precluded (Staff Regulations of Officials, Annex III, Art. 5) (see paragraphs 58-60) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Ms Nadya Rauff-Nisthar to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.