Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TJ0341

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.
Nadya Rauff-Nisthar v European Commission.
Civil service – Officials – Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – New plea.
Case T-341/21.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:516

 Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022 –
Rauff-Nisthar v Commission

(Case T‑341/21) ( 1 )

(Civil service – Officials – Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – New plea)

1. 

Actions brought by officials – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision adopted after reconsideration of a previous decision – Decision adopted by a competition selection board after reviewing the file of a candidate who has not been included on the reserve list

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90(2) and 91(1))

(see paragraphs 18, 19)

2. 

Actions brought by officials – Act adversely affecting an official – Explicit decision rejecting the complaint – Decision adopted after reconsideration of a previous decision – Account taken of the reasoning therein

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)

(see paragraphs 21-23)

3. 

Officials – Competitions – Obligation on EU institutions to assure all candidates a smooth and regular running of the tests – Infringement – Relevance to the legality of the tests – Conditions – Burden of proof

(see paragraphs 29-33, 42-44, 48-50)

4. 

Actions brought by officials – Pleas in law – Plea alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment – Reliance on the applicant’s individual circumstances in an action brought against a decision of a competition selection board – Rejection

(see paragraph 47)

5. 

Officials – Competitions – Assessment of the aptitudes of candidates – Selection Board’s discretion – Taking into consideration factors other than the performance of the candidates – Precluded

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Annex III, Art. 5)

(see paragraphs 58-60)

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders Ms Nadya Rauff-Nisthar to pay the costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

Top