Ez a dokumentum az EUR-Lex webhelyről származik.
Dokumentum 62019TJ0300
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.
Achema AB and Lifosa AB v European Commission.
State aid – Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources – Operating aid – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Infringement of procedural rights – 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection – 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Article 30 TFEU – Article 110 TFEU – Body of consistent evidence.
Case T-300/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.
Achema AB and Lifosa AB v European Commission.
State aid – Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources – Operating aid – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Infringement of procedural rights – 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection – 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Article 30 TFEU – Article 110 TFEU – Body of consistent evidence.
Case T-300/19.
Európai esetjogi azonosító: ECLI:EU:T:2021:191
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021 –
Achema and Lifosa v Commission
(Case T‑300/19)
(State aid – Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources – Operating aid – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Infringement of procedural rights – 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection – 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Article 30 TFEU – Article 110 TFEU – Body of consistent evidence)
|
1. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision finding State aid compatible with the internal market without opening the formal investigation procedure – Action by interested parties within the meaning of Article 108(2) TFEU – Admissibility – Conditions (Arts 108(2) and (3) and 263, fourth para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 1(h)) (see paras 37-39) |
|
2. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision finding State aid compatible with the internal market without opening the formal investigation procedure – Action by interested parties within the meaning of Article 108(2) TFEU – Identification of the subject matter of the action – Action designed to safeguard the procedural rights of the persons concerned – Pleas that may be put forward (Arts 108(3) and 267, fourth para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 1(h)) (see paras 42, 203-205) |
|
3. |
State aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Compatibility of aid with the internal market – Difficulties of assessment – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure – Serious difficulties – Concept – Objective nature (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4) (see paras 43, 45) |
|
4. |
State aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure in the event of serious difficulties – Concept of serious difficulties – Objective nature – Judicial review – Scope (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4) (see para. 44) |
|
5. |
State aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Compatibility of aid with the internal market – Difficulties of assessment – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure – Serious difficulties – Concept – Objective nature – Burden of proof – Circumstances enabling the existence of such difficulties to be established – Body of consistent evidence concerning the length of the preliminary examination procedure, the circumstances surrounding the adoption of the contested decision, and the content of that decision (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4) (see paras 46, 47, 54-86, 92-112, 115-135, 138-148, 151-178, 209-239) |
|
6. |
State aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Compatibility of aid with the internal market – Difficulties of assessment – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure – Circumstances enabling such difficulties to be established – Mere passage of time exceeding the normal duration of a preliminary investigation not sufficient (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4) (see paras 86, 87) |
|
7. |
State aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Difficulties of assessment – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure – Serious difficulties – Request for additional information not in itself revealing the existence of serious difficulties (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4) (see para. 109) |
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 9209 final of 8 January 2019 on State aid SA.45765 (2018/NN), concerning an aid scheme implemented by the Republic of Lithuania in support of producers of electricity from renewable energy sources (OJ 2019 C 61, p. 1).
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls Commission Decision C(2018) 9209 final of 8 January 2019 on State aid SA.45765 (2018/NN), concerning an aid scheme implemented by the Republic of Lithuania in support of producers of electricity from renewable energy sources; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Achema AB and Lifosa AB; |
|
3. |
Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs. |