Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TA0355

    Case T-355/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions (Civil service — Temporary staff — Article 2(c) of the CEOS — Contract of indefinite duration — Early termination with notice — Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Terms of notice — Abuse of process — Right to be heard — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment)

    OJ C 310, 2.8.2021, p. 20–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.8.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 310/20


    Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions

    (Case T-355/19) (1)

    (Civil service - Temporary staff - Article 2(c) of the CEOS - Contract of indefinite duration - Early termination with notice - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Terms of notice - Abuse of process - Right to be heard - Principle of sound administration - Rights of the defence - Manifest error of assessment)

    (2021/C 310/24)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

    Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: S. Bachotet and M. Esparrago Arzadun, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

    Re:

    Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 16 April 2019 by which the Committee of the Regions terminated the applicant’s employment contract and, in the alternative, annulment of the letter of 16 May 2019 by which it extended the date until which the applicant could recover her personal effects and access her e-mail during the period of notice and, second, compensation for the loss of the applicant’s personal effects and access to her e-mail, and, second, for compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 16 April 2019 terminating CE’s employment contract as regards the specific arrangements for giving notice;

    2.

    Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

    3.

    Orders each party to bear its own costs including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.


    (1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.


    Top