This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TO0375
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2019.
Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.
Action for annulment and for damages — Institutional law — European Parliament — Work of a delegation outside the European Union — Decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan — List of the persons authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan which did not include the name of the applicant — Period within which an action must be brought — Late submission — Measure not open to challenge — Disregard of formal requirements — Inadmissibility.
Case T-375/18.
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2019.
Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.
Action for annulment and for damages — Institutional law — European Parliament — Work of a delegation outside the European Union — Decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan — List of the persons authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan which did not include the name of the applicant — Period within which an action must be brought — Late submission — Measure not open to challenge — Disregard of formal requirements — Inadmissibility.
Case T-375/18.
Court reports – general
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2019 –
Gollnisch v Parliament
(Case T‑375/18)
(Action for annulment and for damages — Institutional law — European Parliament — Work of a delegation outside the European Union — Decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan — List of the persons authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan which did not include the name of the applicant — Period within which an action must be brought — Late submission — Measure not open to challenge — Disregard of formal requirements — Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Action for annulment — Actionable measures — Meaning — Measures producing binding legal effects — Silence or inaction of an institution — Treatment as an implied rejection decision — Precluded (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paras 35, 36, 40, 41) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Action seeking compensation for loss caused by an EU institution — No indications as to the character and extent of the damage suffered or as to the causal link — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 340, 2nd para. TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 46-48) |
Re:
Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for, primarily, the annulment of the decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan of 20 March 2018, listing the persons who were authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan and, in the alternative, the annulment of two decisions of implied refusal, and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, for repair of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that measure.
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Parliament. |