This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0467
Case T-467/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Audimas v EUIPO — Audi (AUDIMAS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AUDIMAS — Earlier EU word mark AUDI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-467/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Audimas v EUIPO — Audi (AUDIMAS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AUDIMAS — Earlier EU word mark AUDI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-467/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Audimas v EUIPO — Audi (AUDIMAS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AUDIMAS — Earlier EU word mark AUDI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 305, 9.9.2019, p. 53–54
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.9.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 305/53 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Audimas v EUIPO — Audi (AUDIMAS)
(Case T-467/18) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark AUDIMAS - Earlier EU word mark AUDI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 305/64)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Audimas AB (Kaunas, Lithuania) (represented by G. Domkutė-Lukauskienė, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2018 (Case R 2425/2017-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Audi and Audimas.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Audimas AB to pay the costs. |