This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CA0229
Case C-229/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Evonik Degussa GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Free allocation — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Annex I — Decision 2011/278/EU — Annex I, Part 2 — Determination of product benchmarks — Production of hydrogen — System boundaries of the product benchmark for hydrogen — Process element of separation of hydrogen in a rich gas stream which already contains hydrogen)
Case C-229/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Evonik Degussa GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Free allocation — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Annex I — Decision 2011/278/EU — Annex I, Part 2 — Determination of product benchmarks — Production of hydrogen — System boundaries of the product benchmark for hydrogen — Process element of separation of hydrogen in a rich gas stream which already contains hydrogen)
Case C-229/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Evonik Degussa GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Free allocation — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Annex I — Decision 2011/278/EU — Annex I, Part 2 — Determination of product benchmarks — Production of hydrogen — System boundaries of the product benchmark for hydrogen — Process element of separation of hydrogen in a rich gas stream which already contains hydrogen)
OJ C 240, 9.7.2018, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/05/2018
- Date lodged:
- 02/05/2017
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling - decision unnecessary, Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62017CJ0229
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
Case C-229/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Evonik Degussa GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Free allocation — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Annex I — Decision 2011/278/EU — Annex I, Part 2 — Determination of product benchmarks — Production of hydrogen — System boundaries of the product benchmark for hydrogen — Process element of separation of hydrogen in a rich gas stream which already contains hydrogen)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Evonik Degussa GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-229/17) ( 1 )
‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Free allocation — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Annex I — Decision 2011/278/EU — Annex I, Part 2 — Determination of product benchmarks — Production of hydrogen — System boundaries of the product benchmark for hydrogen — Process element of separation of hydrogen in a rich gas stream which already contains hydrogen)’
2018/C 240/08Language of the case: GermanReferring court
Verwaltungsgericht Berlin
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Evonik Degussa GmbH
Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany
Operative part of the judgment
Annex I, Part 2, to Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that a process, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not produce hydrogen by chemical synthesis, but only isolates hydrogen already contained in a gas mixture, does not fall within the system boundaries of the product benchmark for hydrogen. It would be otherwise only if that process, first, is associated with ‘production of hydrogen’ within the meaning of Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 and, second, have a technical connection with it.
( 1 ) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
