This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CB0129
Case C-129/15: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — H.M. v Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 1(9) — Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ — Hospital set up to make a profit, whose capital is entirely private — Over 50 % or 30 % of income coming from payments by the public sickness insurance scheme in exchange for the provision of medical services — Article 7(b) — Estimated value of the contract — Threshold not met — Certain cross-border interest — Lack of information — Article 53(2) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-129/15: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — H.M. v Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 1(9) — Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ — Hospital set up to make a profit, whose capital is entirely private — Over 50 % or 30 % of income coming from payments by the public sickness insurance scheme in exchange for the provision of medical services — Article 7(b) — Estimated value of the contract — Threshold not met — Certain cross-border interest — Lack of information — Article 53(2) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-129/15: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — H.M. v Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 1(9) — Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ — Hospital set up to make a profit, whose capital is entirely private — Over 50 % or 30 % of income coming from payments by the public sickness insurance scheme in exchange for the provision of medical services — Article 7(b) — Estimated value of the contract — Threshold not met — Certain cross-border interest — Lack of information — Article 53(2) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 343, 19.9.2016, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 07/07/2016
- Date lodged:
- 16/03/2015
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Bulgarian
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62015CO0129
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
19.9.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 343/10 |
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — H.M. v Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI)
(Case C-129/15) (1)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public supply contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 1(9) - Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ - Hospital set up to make a profit, whose capital is entirely private - Over 50 % or 30 % of income coming from payments by the public sickness insurance scheme in exchange for the provision of medical services - Article 7(b) - Estimated value of the contract - Threshold not met - Certain cross-border interest - Lack of information - Article 53(2) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2016/C 343/13)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Administrativen sad Sofia-grad
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: H.M.
Defendant: Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI)
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Administrative Court of the City of Sofia, Bulgaria) by decision of 4 March 2015 is manifestly inadmissible.
