This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CO0370
Argo Group International Holdings v OHIM
Argo Group International Holdings v OHIM
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 —
Argo Group International Holdings v OHIM
(Case C‑370/14 P)
‛Appeals — Community trade mark — Figurative mark in colour including the word element ‘ARIS’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark in red and blue including the word elements ‘ARISA ASSURANCES S.A.’ — Refusal of registration’
|
1. |
Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256, TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 24, 39) |
|
2. |
Appeals — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (see para. 28) |
|
3. |
Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 32, 33) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Argo Group International Holdings Ltd is ordered to bear its own costs. |
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 —
Argo Group International Holdings v OHIM
(Case C‑370/14 P)
‛Appeals — Community trade mark — Figurative mark in colour including the word element ‘ARIS’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark in red and blue including the word elements ‘ARISA ASSURANCES S.A.’ — Refusal of registration’
|
1. |
Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256, TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 24, 39) |
|
2. |
Appeals — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (see para. 28) |
|
3. |
Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 32, 33) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Argo Group International Holdings Ltd is ordered to bear its own costs. |