Utilisez des guillemets («" "») pour effectuer une recherche sur une expression exacte. Ajoutez un astérisque («*») à un terme de recherche pour en trouver des variantes («transp*» ou «32019R*»). Utilisez un point d’interrogation («?») pour remplacer un caractère dans votre terme de recherche afin d’en trouver des variantes (exemple: «ca?e» fournira les résultats correspondant à «case», «cape», etc.).
Case C-581/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa
— CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 30 July 2019 — FRENETIKEXITO — UNIPESSOAL, LDA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 October 2020. Frenetikexito – Unipessoal Lda v Autoridade Tributária e
Aduaneira. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies
subject to VAT – Exemptions – Article 132(1)(c) – Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical
professions – Nutrition monitoring and advice – Sports, physical well-being and fitness activities – Concepts of a single
complex supply, a supply ancillary to the main supply, and independent supplies – Criteria. Case C-581/19.
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2021. Frenetikexito – Unipessoal Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD). Reference
for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies subject to
VAT – Exemptions – Article 132(1)(c) – Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions
– Nutrition monitoring and advice – Sports, physical well-being and fitness activities – Concepts of a single complex supply,
a supply ancillary to the main supply, and independent supplies – Criteria. Case C-581/19.