Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 52019PC0469

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council for Trade in Goods of the World Trade Organisation as regards the rules of procedure of the Committee on Trade Facilitation

COM/2019/469 final

Brussels, 15.10.2019

COM(2019) 469 final

2019/0222(NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council for Trade in Goods of the World Trade Organisation as regards the rules of procedure of the Committee on Trade Facilitation


EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1.Subject matter of the proposal

This proposal establishes the position to be taken on the Union's behalf in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in connection with the proposed adoption of the rules of procedures of the Committee on Trade Facilitation ("the Committee"), pursuant to the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement ("the Agreement").

2.Context of the proposal

2.1.The Trade Facilitation Agreement

The Agreement, to which the EU is a party 1 , was adopted at the 9th Bali Ministerial WTO Ministerial Conference in 2013 with the aim of simplifying, modernising and facilitating export and import processes among WTO members. It contains provisions on speedier, simplified, more transparent and more efficient procedures at the border, expediting the movement, release and clearance of goods, including goods in transit and sets out measures for effective cooperation among customs and other appropriate authorities on trade facilitation and customs compliance. The Agreement entered into force on 22 February 2017.

2.2.The envisaged act of the Council on Trade in Goods

Article 23.1 of the Agreement establishes the Committee on Trade Facilitation and provides that "the Committee shall establish its own rules of procedure". To that end, a proposal was made by Japan, Argentina, Norway and Paraguay which received the full support at the last meeting of the WTO Trade Facilitation Committee on 25 June 2019. The proposed rules are of an administrative nature and ensure the efficient organisation and proceedings during the meetings of the Trade Facilitation Committee.

In accordance with Article IV.6 of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO, the rules of procedure of subsidiary bodies such as the Trade Facilitation Committee need to be approved by the WTO Council on Trade in Goods in order to enter into force.

3.Position to be taken on the Union's behalf

The rules of procedure are of an administrative nature. They aim at ensuring an efficient functioning of the Trade Facilitation Agreement. It is in the interest of the EU to adopt these rules that received full support at the meeting of the Trade Facilitation Committee so that the Committee works well and monitors efficiently the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement. These rules are based on the Rules of Procedure of the General Council of the WTO 2 and adjusted only to meet the specific needs of the Trade Facilitation Committee. For example, Rule 1 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Council is complemented by an obligation that the Committee meets at least once a year, which is not the case for the General Council. Another illustration is that the invitation for the meetings should preferably be issued three weeks before the meetings in order to facilitate the preparation of the positions that sometimes can be complex, in particular when related to aid associated to the implementation of certain commitments. In the General Council, meetings can be convened at very short notice if there is an urgency and normally within 10 working days (Rule 2).

4.Legal basis

4.1.Procedural legal basis

4.1.1.Principles

Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for decisions establishing ‘the positions to be adopted on the Union’s behalf in a body set up by an agreement, when that body is called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, with the exception of acts supplementing or amending the institutional framework of the agreement.’

The concept of ‘acts having legal effects’ includes acts that have legal effects by virtue of the rules of international law governing the body in question. It also includes instruments that do not have a binding effect under international law, but that are ‘capable of decisively influencing the content of the legislation adopted by the EU legislature’ 3 .

4.1.2.Application to the present case

The World Trade Organisation is an international organisation set up by the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO. (The WTO "Agreement"). The Trade Facilitation Committee has been established as a subsidiary body under the authority of the Council on Trade in Goods.

The act which the Council on Trade in Goods is called upon to adopt constitutes an act having legal effects. The envisaged act does not supplement or amend the institutional framework of the Agreement. It only approves the rules for the functioning of the Committee on Trade Facilitation.

Therefore, the procedural legal basis for the proposed decision is Article 207(3) and (4) in conjunction with Article 218(9) TFEU.

4.2.Substantive legal basis

4.2.1.Principles

The substantive legal basis for a decision under Article 218(9) TFUE depends primarily on the objective and content of the envisaged act in respect of which a position is taken on behalf of the EU. If the envisaged Act pursues two aims or has two components and if one of those aims or components is identifiable as the main one, whereas the other is merely incidental, the decision under Article 218(9) TFEU must be founded on a single substantive legal basis namely that required by the main or predominant component.

4.2.2.Application to the present case

The main objective and content of the envisaged act relates to the common commercial policy. Therefore, the substantive legal basis of the proposed decision is the first subparagraph of Article 207(4) of the TFEU.

4.3.Conclusion

The legal basis of the proposed decision should be the first subparagraph of Article 207(4) of the TFEU in conjunction with Article 218(9) TFEU.

5.Publication of the envisaged act

Not applicable.

2019/0222 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council for Trade in Goods of the World Trade Organisation as regards the rules of procedure of the Committee on Trade Facilitation

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular first subparagraph of Article 207(4) in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)The Agreement on Trade Facilitation (“the Agreement”) was concluded by the Union on the basis of Council Decision (EU) 2015/1947 4 and entered into force on 22 February 2017.

(2)Pursuant to Article 23.1 of the Agreement, the Committee on Trade Facilitation may establish its own rules of procedure.

(3)Pursuant to Article IV.6 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation, the rules of procedure of the Committee on Trade Facilitation are subject to the approval of the Council for Trade in Goods.

(4)It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf in the Council for Trade in Goods, as the envisaged decision will be binding on the Union.

(5)It is appropriate to agree with the proposed rules of procedure, which will enable the Committee on Trade Facilitation to operate efficiently. They are based on the Rules of Procedure of the General Council of the World Trade Organisation with adjustments to meet the specific needs of the Committee on Trade Facilitation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure of the Committee on Trade Facilitation, shall be to support their adoption, as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Commission.

Done at Brussels,

   For the Council

   The President

(1)    Council Decision (EU) 2015/1947 of 1 October 2015 OJ L 284; 30.10.2015 p 1-2.
(2)    Document WT/L/161 of 25.7.1996 "Rules of procedure for sessions of the Ministerial Conference and meetings of the General Council.
(3)    Judgment of the Court of Justice of 7 October 2014, Germany v Council, C-399/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2258, paragraphs 61 to 64.
(4)    Council Decision (EU) 2015/1947 of 1 October 2015 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (OJ L 284, 30.10.2015, p. 1).
Top

Brussels, 15.10.2019

COM(2019) 469 final

ANNEX

to the

Proposal for a Council Decision

on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council for Trade in Goods of the World Trade Organisation as regards the rules of procedure of the Committee on Trade Facilitation


ANNEX

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRADE FACILITATION 1

The Rules of Procedure for meetings of the General Council (WT/L/161) be applied mutatis mutandis to meetings of the Committee on Trade Facilitation, except as follows:

Chapter I — Meetings

(a)Rule 1 (of the General Council) should be amended in line with paragraph 1.2 of Article 23 of the Agreement on Trade Facilitation to provide that:

"The Committee shall meet as needed and envisaged by the provisions of the Agreement on Trade Facilitation, but no less than once a year."

(b)The first sentence of Rule 2 should be amended to read as follows:

"Meetings of the Committee shall be convened by the Director-General by a notice issued preferably three weeks, and in any event not less than ten calendar days, prior to the date set for the meeting."

Chapter II — Agenda

(c)Rule 5 should not be applied. 2

(d)Rule 11 should be modified to read as follows:

"Representatives of international intergovernmental organizations may attend the meetings as observers on the invitation of the Committee on Trade Facilitation in accordance with the guidelines in Annex 3 to the Rules of the General Council.

Furthermore, in accordance with Article 23:1:5 of the Agreement on Trade Facilitation, the Committee may invite representatives of other international organizations with competence in the field of trade facilitation or their subsidiary bodies to:

(a)attend meetings of the Committee; and

(b)discuss specific matters related to the implementation of this Agreement."

Chapter V — Officers

(e)Rules 12, 13 and 14 should be amended to authorize the Committee to elect a Vice-Chairperson. Accordingly, Rules 12, 13 and 14 should read as follows:

"Rule 12. The Committee shall elect a Chairperson 3 and may elect a Vice-Chairperson from among the representatives of Members. The election shall take place at the first meeting of the year and shall take effect at the end of the meeting. The Chairperson and ViceChairperson shall hold office until the end of the first meeting of the following year.

Rule 13. If the Chairperson is absent from any meeting or part thereof, the Vice-Chairperson shall perform the functions of the Chairperson. If no Vice-Chairperson was elected or if the Vice-Chairperson is not present, the Committee shall elect an interim Chairperson for that meeting or that part of the meeting.

Rule 14. If the Chairperson can no longer perform the functions of the office, the Committee shall designate the Vice-Chairperson referred to in Rule 12 or, if no Vice-Chairperson was elected it shall elect an interim Chairperson to perform those functions pending the election of a new Chairperson."

Chapter VI — Conduct of business

(f)The first sentence of Rule 24 should be amended to read as follows:

"In order to expedite the conduct of business, the Chairperson may invite representatives that wish to express their support for a given proposal to show their hands, in order to be duly recorded in the records as supporting statements …."

Chapter VII — Decision-Making

(g)Rule 33 should be amended to read as follows:

"Where a decision cannot be arrived at by consensus, the matter at issue shall be referred to the Council for Trade in Goods."

(h)Rule 34 should not apply.

__________

(1)    Based on the Communication from Argentina, Japan, Norway and Paraguay (G/TFA/W/14).
(2)    Sufficient preparation and circulation of the agenda is secured by the GC Rules of Procedure through Rules 2, 3 and 6.
(3)    The Committee shall apply the relevant guidelines contained in the "Guidelines for Appointment of Officers to WTO Bodies" (WT/L/31, dated 7 February 1995).
Top