This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0219
Case C-219/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against QS
Case C-219/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against QS
Case C-219/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against QS
OJ C 266, 11.7.2022, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.7.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 266/11 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against QS
(Case C-219/22)
(2022/C 266/13)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Rayonen sad Nesebar
Party to the main proceedings
QS
Question referred
Must Article 3(3) of Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA (1) of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as Article 68(1) of the NK, in conjunction with Article 8(2) thereof, which provides that the national court seised of an application for execution of the sentence imposed by a previous conviction handed down by a court of another Member State may, for that purpose, alter the arrangements for executing that sentence by ordering its actual execution?