Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023CN0086

    Case C-86/23, HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 February 2023 — E.N.I., Y.K.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG

    OJ C 155, 2.5.2023, p. 34–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.5.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 155/34


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 February 2023 — E.N.I., Y.K.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG

    (Case C-86/23, HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung)

    (2023/C 155/45)

    Language of the case: Bulgarian

    Referring court

    Varhoven kasatsionen sad

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellants: E.N.I., Y.K.I.

    Respondent: HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG

    Question referred

    Must Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II Regulation) be interpreted as meaning that a rule of national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the application of a fundamental principle of the law of the Member State, such as the principle of fairness, in the determination of compensation for non-material damage in cases where the death of a close person has occurred as a result of a tort or delict, may be regarded as an overriding mandatory provision within the meaning of that article?


    (1)  OJ 2007 L 199, p. 40.


    Top